Sequoia daw

Author: g | 2025-04-24

DAW Compatibility with Sequoia. Below is a list of the most common DAWs and their compatibility with macOS 15 (Sequoia). We recommend checking each providers'

Magix Sequoia Pro 17 - DAW

Samplitude is a good recording system. But one requires Sequoia to do intricate editing. The editing model in Samplitude is not the same as in Sequoia. Sequoia is the best sounding daw of all time in my opinion. The audio engine is very sophisticated. Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2020 Posts: 4,054 Verified Member 🎧 5 years Quote: Originally Posted by Miles Flint ➡️ Not for Sequoia afaik. But you can try the Samplitude Pro X5 demo... (30 day trial).The workflow is the same, some features are Sequoia exclusive obviously :-) Oh that’s a shame. I really wanted to try Sequoia. Lives for gear Quote: Originally Posted by Plush ➡️ Samplitude is a good recording system. But one requires Sequoia to do intricate editing. The editing model in Samplitude is not the same as in Sequoia. Sequoia is the best sounding daw of all time in my opinion. The audio engine is very sophisticated. 2 things:1- As a Samp user, I'd like to think it has the same audio engine as Sequoia. True...? I've always thought Samp sounded better than any other DAW I've tried. (Have not tried Sequoia...)2- What types of edits would be required by an ME on a routine basis that would make it only feasible in Sequoia?Thnx Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2020 Posts: 4,054 Verified Member 🎧 5 years 4-Point/Source-Destination Editing comes to mind. Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2005 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by dfghdhr ➡️ Oh that’s a shame. I really

Magix Sequoia Pro 365 - DAW

Gear Nut Joined: Jan 2014 Posts: 99 🎧 10 years Samp Pro X3 Suite vs. Sequoia I've hoped to someday get Sequoia, mostly to edit piano classical recordings. It's expensive so not a casual decision. I sort of understand four point editing and have seen youtube demos where it produces clean edits in a fraction of the time.I know samp x3 does not do four point, but given the current deal on samp x3 suite, just wanted to make sure I'm not missing a buying opportunity. Is samp x3 at all uniquely useful for complex/delicate audio editing (classical piano) or is it about the same as other daws?I've looked for an upgrade path deal from samp x3 suite to sequoia and haven't seen anything. Anyone know about this?Thanks! Registered User Joined: May 2017 Posts: 20 🎧 5 years Samplitude Pro X3 Suite has about 96% the features of its big brother Sequoia in it.Samplitude is a very complete DAW. Deep, stable.You never go wrong with Samplitude. Gear Nut Joined: Jan 2014 Posts: 99 🎧 10 years Quote: Originally Posted by Johnny Blade ➡️ Samplitude Pro X3 Suite has about 96% the features of its big brother Sequoia in it.Samplitude is a very complete DAW. Deep, stable.You never go wrong with Samplitude. Thanks good to hear and I might eventually come up to speed on samp as a general purpose daw. Your 96% estimate is incredible for $149 v. $3k for Sequoia.Anyone use Sequoia for 4 pt editing (especially classical recordings) - how close/different is Samp? Registered User Joined: May 2017 Posts: 20 🎧 5 years Quote: Originally Posted by rmgatl ➡️ Your 96% estimate is incredible for $149 v. $3k for Sequoia. From expert Tim Dolbear- Gear Nut Joined: Jan 2014 Posts: 99 🎧 10 years Quote: Originally Posted by Johnny Blade ➡️ From expert Tim Dolbear- Found the thread - thanks, interesting.Got confirmation that 4 pt. is Sequoia only so hoping they do a blow out sale on Sequoia as well LOL. Or maybe an upgrade path samp x3-->sequoia? No evidence of that yet. Lives for gear Joined: Mar

Magix Sequoia Pro 17 - DAW - pluginmax.com

But it's not in the on-screen dialog.I see you're now a member of the Magix-hosted support forum, and that's the best place to ask such detailed questions. David Gear Nut Joined: Jan 2014 Posts: 99 🎧 10 years Quote: Originally Posted by David Rick ➡️ Of all the Sequoia-only features vs Samplitude, the crossfade editor, 4-point editing and multi-synchronous assembly are the main ones that matter to classical recordists. The other features like multi-user administration and batch scripts are mostly intended for big media organizations. Those of us who do classical production as independent engineers and producers have always felt we were being taken advantage of by the price differential, esp. since two of these three features have been unchanged through seven major releases. (Don't get me started on Sequoia service agreements and upgrade pricing!)My advice is to keep an eye out for someone selling a transferable Sequoia license, even if it's a version or two back. Then use that for your editing work, and do everything else in Samplitude. There are a few extra fade curves in Sequoia, but once you copy those to the correct Samplitude directory, the same audio files will open on either platform.David L. RickSeventh String Recording Yes the prices for upgrades to new versions are incredible, never seen anything like it. I'm a university prof and can therefore get educational pricing - but that's still $1500 for Sequoia.Just confirmed no upgrade path from samp x3 to Sequoia, no surprise there. Maybe I'll choke down $1500 at some point. In the meantime, as cheap as samp is now, I probably won't get it because I already have other daw software I would probably use first for routine stuff. You don't need Sequoia for classical editing.The crossfades available in Samplitude, the workflow etc. is just the top for classical editing (my opinion of course).Save money for a good audio chain!Never heard someone saying "I should have Sequoia to edit my production instead of Samplitude..."If you know how to edit, Samplitude is perfect. Last edited by fred2bern; 20th December 2017 at 08:10 AM.. Gear Nut Joined: Jan. DAW Compatibility with Sequoia. Below is a list of the most common DAWs and their compatibility with macOS 15 (Sequoia). We recommend checking each providers' DAW Compatibility with Sequoia. Below is a list of the most common DAWs and their compatibility with macOS 15 (Sequoia). We recommend checking each providers' webpage for up-to-date

Grabacion MIDI Retrospectiva Samplitude Sequoia DAW

Here... No, not the crossfade editor engine. I'm talking about The Magix Audio dsp code engine that runs the whole SEQUOIA daw. The one in SEQUOIA is very sophisticated and exact. To my ears, noticeably better than all others. On a different topic that you raise, crossfade editors in Samp. and SEQUOIA are much different. Not the same.Don't care what others say. I can show your ears what I mean here in my edit room. I was astounded when I switched to SEQUOIA 3 years ago. Quote: Originally Posted by Plush; On a different topic that you raise, crossfade editors in Samp. and SEQUOIA are much different. Not the same.. Very different. There is no crossfade editor in Samplitude. Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2012 Posts: 1,373 🎧 10 years Quote: Originally Posted by Plush ➡️ No, not the crossfade editor engine. I'm talking about The Magix Audio dsp code engine that runs the whole SEQUOIA daw. The one in SEQUOIA is very sophisticated and exact. To my ears, noticeably better than all others. On a different topic that you raise, crossfade editors in Samp. and SEQUOIA are much different. Not the same.Don't care what others say. I can show your ears what I mean here in my edit room. I was astounded when I switched to SEQUOIA 3 years ago. I don't know if you're speaking to me or someone else... but I never talked about the crossfade editor in Sequoia. I said that the object editor window is

[Solved] Sequoia - issues with USB DAW devices

Me. I have not had a crash in maybe 5 or 6 years. Last year I worked 16 hr days, 7 days a week for 9 months. Never a lock up or crash. VSTi, and rewire are flawless for me. Jeff maybe you have lost a sense of perspective through over-working Registered User Joined: Feb 2009 Posts: 2,663 🎧 15 years I don't know about loss of perspective, but those hours were rough no doubt! Did get me a new house and studio so it was worth it. Never again though. tutt I am curious what audition had that SAM needed to catch up with as stated earlier? Gear Maniac Joined: Nov 2009 Posts: 211 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by saovi ➡️ Maybe. But don't use it in sample rate conversion capacity:SRC ComparisonsCheck all versions 8-10. Not something to rely on. For contrast, check against Pro Tools HD or iZotope 64-bit. BTW: The samples on this site do not make use of the best SCR possible in Samplitude/Sequoia, we could figure this out. SRC is indeed very good in Sequoia, especially the highest quality (but slow) offline SRC. Registered User Joined: Nov 2007 Posts: 541 🎧 15 years I like the videos.I love Samplitude/Sequoia (and I've used PT and others extensively in other studios, and I can fly in Sequoia).Thanks Jeff, now maybe someone else will believe me Greg Moderator Joined: Jun 2006 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by ManOnAMission ➡️ No. The mix engines of every daw is programmed differently. They all sound different. Samplitude mixes are more "open" than other DAWs I have tried. Quote: Originally Posted by Lemonsqueezer ➡️ As I've stated, I hate the facepalm smiley already, but here it's totally justified. Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by ManOnAMission ➡️ No. The mix engines of every daw is programmed differently. They all sound different. Samplitude mixes are more "open" than other DAWs I have tried. Samplitude nulls with reaper...but is a million light years ahead of it. Registered User Joined: Jun 2009 Posts: 2,052 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by spasm_dtc ➡️ i think i'll end up opening a topic called "why sequoia (or any other daw for that matter) is NOT the better daw" ...haven't we had that stupid discussion over and over again on GS? it's almost as bad as the mac vs. pc thread, and just as empty and useless, almost as empty and useless as kreeper6's coming out as the better troll just above. i agree in all points! Registered User Joined: Dec 2009 Posts: 1,126 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by KRStudio ➡️ I've run my studio with Samplitude pro since V2.5 and love it. Samplitude has used VST since V5 which has been a hell of a lot longer than the 3 years stated by someone else here. It's closer to 9 years, and had ADC since day one. I like being able to track, mix, master, and

Hablemos de Samplitude / Sequoia DAW - YouTube

"Why Audition?". And they clearly talked about its superior editing. I have the impression that Sampie and Sequoia are more popular in Europe. Is that true? But yeah, I thought they were the first with GOOD frequency analysis that comes with the DAW. Could be wrong. Again, Im mostly a defender as I see Audition 3.0 as wrongfully disrespected and often very misunderstood. you are basically correct in your assumptions.2 things to know:1) the feature that vid#2 talks the most about is object-based editing. Samplitude/Sequioa has been doing this since about 1992. This is the big deal. That & being a non-destructive editor when Soundesigner was still doing destructive edits. I used to capture audio & do restoration in CoolEdit.2) a more general point. SAMDEV does not talk about their audio engine, ever. However, those in the know have been able to figure out that key parts of the Samplitude sound is 80 bit processing in key parts of the audio engine. As far as I know, nobody else is doing that, and it means that Sequioatude is probably running an an engine far more accurate then almost any DAW (PTHD included). Sampie has also had "Elastic Audio" & the Spectral tool for several versions now (from 7 or 8 I forget which).Last point: Sequoia main market niche is in mastering. It looks to be eating into the SADIE/SonicStudio market share. As such, it is not a direct competitor with PT (although it could be).At this point Audition (which may be a fine application) is an orphan of to many corporate ownership changes. Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Posts: 2,271 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by jrwaltb ➡️ "Samplitude nulls with reaper...but is a million light years ahead of it."Please post where you saw this test. Last time I checked the reaper forum the guy claiming files from all daws null was not looking close enough. The way a daw is coded DOES make a difference but I am not saying I know which one sounds better. The whole null test between sequencers is a VERY hard test to do correctly so it's always funny when people say "Daw A nulls with Daw B , your ears are wrong". as far as I have seen, Samplitude has never nulled with anyone (double negative, is that good grammer? ). Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 🎧 15 years Quote: Originally Posted by jrwaltb ➡️ "Samplitude nulls with reaper...but is a million light years ahead of it."Please post where you saw this test. Last time I checked the reaper forum the guy claiming files from all daws null was not looking close enough. The way a daw is coded DOES make a difference but I am not saying I know which one sounds better. The whole null test between sequencers is a VERY hard test to do correctly so it's always funny when people say "Daw A nulls with Daw B , your ears are wrong". I wrote about it. DAW Compatibility with Sequoia. Below is a list of the most common DAWs and their compatibility with macOS 15 (Sequoia). We recommend checking each providers'