D management

By Lance, Updated on: August 26, 2024 Disk partitions are allocated by OEM manufacturers or by server administrator while installing operating system. When system C: drive is getting full, many people ask whether it is possible to merge C and D drive, so free space in drive D will be transferred into C drive. The answer is yes, you can combine C and D drive in Windows Server 2019/2022. But if your aim is to extend system C drive, you'd better resize partition instead of merging partitions. In this article, I'll introduce 2 ways to merge C and D/E drive in Server 2019/2022 and better method to resize disk partition without losing data. Content: Merge C and D in Server 2019/2022 Disk Management Combine C and D/E drive with server partition editor Resize partition instead of merging C and D/E drive Merge C and D in Server 2019/2022 Disk Management Windows Server 2019 and 2022 has native Disk Management utility, it has no "Merge Volume" function, but you can use another "Extend Volume" function to combine C and D drive indirectly. Drive D will be removed no matter you use Windows Disk Management or third party software. If you have programs or Windows services in this partition, do not merge drive D to C. If you can remove D drive, remember to transfer files to other place in advance. Steps to merge C and D drive in Windows Server 2019/2022 via Disk Management: Transfer or back up the files in drive D to other place. Press Windows + X on the keyboard and click Disk Management in the list. Right click D: drive and select Delete Volume. Right click C: drive and select Extend Volume. Finish Extend Volume Wizard by simply clicking Next. If your system disk is MBR, the contiguous D drive must be Primary, otherwise, Disk Management cannot merge D to C after deleting. Because "Extend Volume" function can only merge unallocated space to the left contiguous partition. Remember, Disk Management can only merge D to C or combine E to D, it cannot merge D to E

Categories. A. 4 B. 8 C. 6 D. none of the above Answer» B. 8 15. For the rural areas, the socioeconomic system use _________ of the chief wage earner. A. occupation and type of home B. education and occupation C. education and type of home D. none of the above Answer» A. occupation and type of home 16. Socioeconomic system classifies rural households into _____ broad categories. A. 8 B. 6 C. 4 D. none of the above Answer» C. 4 17. Social class is indicated by ________variables. A. single B. several C. none D. none of the above Answer» B. several 18. A person’s _________ are all the groups that have a direct or indirect influence on their attitudes or behavior. A. inspirational groups B. reference groups C. dissociative groups D. none of the above Answer» B. reference groups 19. Process of manage information about customers to maximize loyalty is said to be A. company relationship management B. supplier management C. retailers management D. customer relationship management Answer» D. customer relationship management 20. In buyer decision process, percentage of potential customers in a given target market is called A. customer funnel B. company funnel C. marketing funnel D. retailers funnel Answer» C. marketing funnel 21. Aggregate value of customer's base is classified as A. shareholder value B. base value C. retention value D. marketers base value Answer» A. shareholder value 22. Record which is based on business customers past purchases, sales price and volumes is classified as A.

Business database B. customer database C. databases marketing D. company marketing Answer» A. business database 23. Whole cluster of benefits when company promises to deliver through its market offering is called A. value proposition B. customer proposition C. product proposition D. brand proposition Answer» A. value proposition 24. Third step in customer's value analysis A. assessing attributes importance B. assessing company\s performance C. monitoring competitors performance D. both b and c Answer» D. both b and c 25. All costs customer expects to incur to buy any market offering is called A. total economic cost B. total functional cost C. total customer cost D. total functional cost Answer» C. total customer cost 26. Percentage or number of customers who move from one level to next level in buying decision process is called A. conversion rates B. marketing rates C. shopping rates D. loyalty rates Answer» A. conversion rates 27. Customized products and services for customers and interaction to individual customers are part of A. retailers management B. customer relationship management C. company relationship management D. supplier management Answer» B. customer relationship management 28. Company's 'customer relationship capital' is another name of A. satisfied customers B. dissatisfied customers C. customer retention D. customer conversion Answer» A. satisfied customers 29. Company's monetary, time and energy cost, all are included in A. total customer cost B. psychological cost C. personal benefits D. image benefits Answer» A. total customer cost 30. A person or company that yields a revenue more than incurred costs of

Supporting hundreds of companies worldwide to deliver great learning and development experiencesLearning management simplifiedOne unified app for everything L&DThe complete all in one LMS solution has learning at its core, but also comes with built-in e-learning content, skills development, employee communication and performance management to ensure you see the full value from your L&D. eloomi is a Dayforce company, chosen by Dayforce as the market leading LMS.Value add-onQuality curated eLearning coursesPick from content collections of courses available in 4 different plansThe fastest way to see L&D valueYou will see the value from your L&D faster because eloomi is easy to understand and buy, implement and adopt, use and deliver L&D results. eloomi is the market leading all in one learning management system to deliver L&D value the fastest.Quick to implement and adopt so you can see immediate results from L&DReduces costs and busywork with a platform that makes L&D easy to manageGives you back the time and focus to drive meaningful people developmentFastest implementation, live in 4-6 weeksSolve any learning challenge all in one LMSFrom compliance to onboarding, from skills-building to external training, eloomi L&D software will help you to solve any learning challenge.Ethics and complianceHealth, safety and wellbeing, data and cyber-security, ethics, diversity, inclusion, respectful workplace, and harassment prevention.Revenue enablementWe can help you with sales enablement, customer success, support, and partner enablement training.People engagementEmployee onboarding, professional development, leadership development, and social engagement.People developmentPerformance management is integrated with eLearning content so people development becomes embedded in your business.What’s includedL&D basics

SK D&D implements 'board-centric management' to enhance stakeholder interest and happiness, and innovate its governance structure. To strengthen the oversight role of the Board of Directors (BOD) as the highest decision-making body, the majority of the BOD comprises independent directors. The BOD operates several committees — including the HR Committee, the Independent Director Recommendation Committee, the ESG Committee, and the Audit Committee — to enhance the expertise and efficiency of its operations. To ensure the effective authority of the BOD, regulations for the BOD and its subcommittees are newly established and enhanced, with these regulations disclosed on the website. Additionally, SK D&D has formulated and published the Corporate Governance Charter to achieve transparent and accountable management and establish a robust corporate governance framework. Through these efforts, we aim to expand the responsibilities of the BOD and oversight bodies, enhance shareholder communication through governance disclosures, and achieve long-term stability and growth.Board of Directors’ Composition and ResponsibilitiesComposition of the BoardSK D&D's Board of Directors (BOD) serves as the highest decision-making and supervisory body for management issues affecting the entire company. As of April 2024, it comprises five members (one executive director, three independent directors, and one non-executive director). To enhance objectivity and independent decision-making, the BOD operates with separate roles for the CEO and Chairperson of the Board. Moreover, the Board comprises more than 50% independent directors and appoints experts in various fields such as finance and management as independent directors to reflect diverse perspectives and expertise in board decision-making. Furthermore, we support the BOD in maintaining its practical expertise, independence, and efficiency through the operation of its committees and internal support organizations.Members of the Board*CategoryNameExpertisePositionDate AppointedEnd of TermBoard Attendance in 2023Executive directorDo-hyun KimProfessional managementCEO, ESG Committee2022.03.232025.03.23100%Independent directorJun-cheol KimAccounting/Audit(Certified Public Accountant)Chair of the Board, ESG Committee, HR Committee, Independent Director Recommendation Committee, Audit Committee (chair)2021.03.302027.03.30100%Kyung-min KimEnvironment/DataHR Committee (chair), Independent Director Recommendation Committee, Audit Committee2022.03.232025.03.23100%Mo-doom Kim**Professional management(Lawyer)ESG Committee, HR Committee, Independent Director Recommendation Committee, Audit Committee2024.03.262027.03.26-Non-executive directorJae-min KimFinance/Market analysisESG Committee, HR Committee2018.11.152027.03.30100%*As of Apr. 2024**He was appointed as a new director in March 2024, so there is no attendance record for 2023Career/Appointment Background of Each DirectorNameAppointment BackgroundCareerDo-hyun KimBased on his experience of proactively entering asset management by establishing D&D Investment (DDI), a REIT AMC, to develop SK D&D into a comprehensive real estate company and successfully launching the new urban residential product 'Episode,' we expect him to contribute to the development of new

Selection of environmental performance indicators: Application of the balanced scorecard approach. Corporate Environmental Strategy, 5(4), 34–41.* Joseph, G. (2008). A rationale for stakeholder-based management in developing nations. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 4(2), 136–161.* Kaplan, R. S. (2012). The balanced scorecard: Comments on balanced scorecard commentaries. Journal of Accounting & Organizational Change, 8(4), 539–545.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70, 71–79. Google Scholar Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001a). Balance without profit. Financial Management, 1, 23–26.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001b). The strategy-focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2001c). Transforming the balanced scorecard from performance measurement to strategic management: Part I. Accounting Horizons, 15(1), 87–104.Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (2004). Strategy maps: Converting intangible assets into tangible outcomes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: A systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57–75.Article Google Scholar Kolk, A., & Mauser, A. (2002). The evolution of environmental management: From stage models to performance evaluation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(1), 14–31.Article Google Scholar * Länsiluoto, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2008). Environmental and performance management forces: Integrating “greenness” into balanced scorecard. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 5(3), 184–206.* Länsiluoto, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2010). Greening the balanced scorecard. Business Horizons, 53(4), 385–395.* Länsiluoto, A., & Järvenpää, M. (2012). Integrating greenness into a balanced scorecard in a food processing company. The TQM Journal, 24(5), 388–398.Lee, M.-D. P. (2008). A review of theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutonary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10(1), 53–73.Article Google Scholar * León-Soriano, R., Muñoz-Torres, M. J., & Chalmeta-Rosaleñ, R. (2010). Methodology for sustainability strategic planning and management. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 110(2), 249–268.Li, Y., Vanhaverbeke, W., & Schoenmakers, W. (2008). Exploration and exploitation in innovation: Reframing the interpretation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 17(2), 107–126.Article Google Scholar Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Corporate social responsibility. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 1–7.Article Google Scholar * Lueg, R., & Carvalho e Silva, A. L. (2013). When one size does not fit all: a literature review on the modifications of the balanced scorecard. Problems and Perspectives in Management, 11(3), 86–94.Maltz, A. C., Shenhar, A. J., & Reilly, R. R. (2003). Beyond the balanced scorecard: Refining the search for organizational success measures. Long Range Planning, 36(2), 187–204.Article Google Scholar Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Swaen, V. (2010). Organizational stages and cultural phases: A critical review and a consolidative model of corporate social responsibility development. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 20–38.Article Google Scholar Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1991). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. In W. W.